From decision theory to decision aiding methodology
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper presents the author’s partial and personal historical reconstruction of how decision theory evolved to decision aiding methodology. The presentation shows mainly how “alternative” approaches to classic decision theory evolved. In the paper is claimed that all such decision “theories” share a common methodological feature which is the use of formal and abstract languages as well as of a model of rationality. Different decision aiding approaches can thus be defined, depending on the origin of the model of rationality used in the decision aiding process. The concept of decision aiding process is then introduced and analysed. The paper ultimate claim is that all such approaches can be seen as part of a decision aiding methodology.
منابع مشابه
Chapter 1 ARGUMENTATION THEORY AND DECISION AIDING
The purpose of this chapter is to examine the existent and potential contribution of argumentation theory to decision-aiding, more specifically to multi-criteria decision-aiding. On the one hand, Decision aiding provides a general framework that can be adapted to different contexts of decision-making and a formal theory about preferences. On the other hand Argumentation theory is growing field ...
متن کاملSolving product mix problem in multiple constraints environment using goal programming
The theory of constraints is an approach to production planning and control that emphasizes on the constraints to increase throughput by effectively managing constraint resources. One application in theory of constraints is product mix decision. Product mix influences the performance measures in multi-product manufacturing system. This paper presents an alternative approach by using of goal pro...
متن کاملAn integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy alternatives in Turkey
Energy is a critical factor to obtain a sustainable development for countries and governments. Selection of the most appropriate energy alternative is a completely critical and a complex decision making problem. In this paper, an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets is proposed for selection among energy alternatives. Then a roadmap has been cr...
متن کاملTowards a theory of MCDM: stepping away from social choice theory
The similarity between aggregation procedures in social choice theory and multicriteria decision aiding is well-known : the alternatives play the role of the candidates, the criteria play the role of the voters and the decision-maker plays the role of the society. Many authors, aware of this similarity, have used the formalism of social choice theory in multi-criteria decision aiding; see for e...
متن کاملCase-Based Reasoning Systems: From Automation to Decision-Aiding and Simulation
Over the past decade, case-based reasoning (CBR) has emerged as a major research area within the artificial intelligence research field due to both its widespread usage by humans and its appeal as a methodology for building intelligent systems. Conventional CBR systems have been largely designed as automated problem-solvers for producing a solution to a given problem by adapting the solution to...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- European Journal of Operational Research
دوره 187 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008